Hazrat Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani A FAMOUS BOOK WRITTEN IN DEFENCE OF HAZRAT MUAVIA [R.A] Hazrat Ameer Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Rivayaat By Shaykh Muhammad. Ameer Muawiya Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq Author Mufti Taqi Usmani. May Click to Download Click to Read on Scribd. Post a Comment. For More Islamic Books For More Islamic Books Visit For More I.
|Published (Last):||19 December 2018|
|PDF File Size:||4.52 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.61 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
However, information available through Tawatur is something different and exceptional.
He will decide this issue on the Day of Judgment. There is no doubt that the incident of Karbala is a grave incident of our history.
Hazrat Muavia [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani
I’m not in a position to do so. Whatever is the opinion of Sunnis, Shias or Khawarij on such issues, it is no more than a theory based on doubtful reports because Sunni reports are not acceptable to Shia and vice versa. But I’ll advise you to not rely on me and conduct your own study. Details of this procedure are available here: The approach of Ameerr was to compile all the narrations whether authentic or not in a chronological order.
On the muswiya side, if we keep a bad opinion about the companions and they were free from such accusations, Allah will definitely hold us accountable.
Therefore, there is no charge of revolt against him. If someone portrays a bad picture of any respected person for you e. Because I am the student of history and I know what the Amir Muawia did in his 20 years rule. Dear Brother Assalam o alaikum wa Rahmatullah Thank you very much for answering me.
They will be highly appreciated. You know that a theory means, “it might have happened “. Mohadisin have devised a great procedure to evaluate authenticity of Hadith.
If you study the history of Tabari for such years, you’ll find people in the Sanad of all negative reports about the companions. When the matter is only an issue of doubtful reports, why should we form our opinions based on them.
The views presented in the books belong to their authors and they are responsible for providing the answer raised on their work. Recently, a group of Arab scholars named BarzanjiHallaqZia al- U’mri and Khalil have conducted that evaluation and found that large number of reports in this book are fake.
And he did so and the result was in the form of ” Waqia Karbala”. My point is that if you want to quote an example it should be a good example. There is a discipline in the historical studies that deals with criticism on historical events.
Hazrat muavia r a aur tareekhi haqaiq by shaykh mufti taqi usmani download pdf book
tarwekhi I hope you get my point. Haqais book is available at the following links: If the matter is disturbing you, conduct your own research in the light of above-mentioned procedure. All those who accepted their caliphate will also be charged automatically as they accepted corrupt rulers. I’ll advise you to study that procedure and apply that on the original source of all historical narrations compiled by Tabari.
Please see at least the Unit 1 of this book. If we accept the mkawiya portraying himself as a dictator, the matter will not remain limited to him.
And then he tried to convert the muslim khilafat into malookiat. Nobody believes that Sahaba were free from sin. If a matter with such doubtful information is presented to any court in the world, the judge will not be able to decide the matter and will acquit the suspect based on the benefit of doubt despite of the fact that the suspect and relevant witnesses are available in his court.
The unchallenged information could only be the one which is available to us by ” Tawatur please see the link below ” which is not sufficient to give us a complete picture of the incident. You can take each narration one by one and see the biographies of their narrators compiled by the scholars of Muawwiya. Only that person will reach at a real conclusion ameeg was present at that occasion and bears eyewitness of an incident.
Amder the truth is truth. You can check by yourselves in the “History of Tabari ” that all reports portraying a sleazy picture of the companions are reported by only five persons and all of them are considered as “liars “. I agree with you that narrations from such people should not be accepted in other matters even it is in favor of our view.
Hazrat Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani – Free Books
I’ll sincerely advise you to leave this matter to Allah. I repeat the names: He only compiled the traditions and did not perform evaluation of such reports. Respected Sister Wa alaikum us salam wa Rahmatullah The views presented in tareeekhi books belong to their authors and they are responsible for providing the answer raised on their work.
If the answer is yes, we should go for it but if the answer is no, hhaqaiq to conduct a debate on an issue that has not been settled during last 14 centuries.
Don’t hesitate to share your questions and comments.
In the first century, even it was not possible to distinguish people as the dispute was only political and not religious.
Send at mubashirnazir gmail. The length of ruling period is not a sign of patients. Search the Website New. We also know that all such people disguised themselves in mainstream Muslims.
I hope this will clarify my position on that.