Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (). Individual Differences in Working Memory and Reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, Daneman and Carpenter () developed a measure of WM capacity which required both processing and storage in WM. The task was really two tasks. Daneman and Carpenter (, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, –) developed a measure of working memory capacity, the reading.
|Published (Last):||20 November 2006|
|PDF File Size:||6.74 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.59 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Genetics of verbal working memory processes: Languages Magyar Edit links. Scientific Research An Academic Publisher. Output, working memory, and interlanguage development.
Reading span task
This page was dneman edited on 21 Juneat From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Daneman and Carpenter found that reading span was much more strongly related to reading comprehension than word span. The number of sentences of a series was incrementally increased until a participant’s reading span, or the maximum number of carenter words correctly recalled, was found.
With each sentence presented on a card, participants were cued to recall the memorized end-of-sentence words in their original order by a blank card at the end of a series. The original RST required participants to read series of unconnected sentences aloud and to remember the final word of each sentence of a series grouped according to the total number of sentences.
In the second study, a variant of another attention control test, the Stroop task, was applied, which minimized the load on capacity, and no significant contribution of nad task to Gf was found. Neuropsychology21 5 The reading span task was the first instance of the family of “complex span” tasks as opposed to “simple span” tasks. Retrieved from ” https: Effect of concreteness of target word on verbal working memory: Brain and Cognition451— Phonological similarity faneman in verbal complex span.
Discourse Processes14— In the first study, the antisaccade task was used, the standard measure of attention control, in a modified variant which resulted in scores less sensitive to individual differences in the active buffer capacity, in comparison to the danfman variant.
Reading span task – Wikipedia
carpentet Measuring central executive functioning: Later research corroborated the finding that reading span is more closely related to language comprehension than word span.
Learning, Memory, and Cognition16— Working Memory and Reading Development. Besides the “listening span” variant also developed by Daneman and Carpenter,  several variants have been developed in recent years based upon the RST. Working memory capacity and the use of inferences in text comprehension. A twin study of middle-aged men. In an attempt to formulate a standardized version of the RST, numerous problems with the original and variants of it have been critically examined.
In effect, attention control became a weak predictor of Gf, explaining less than one third of its variance accounted for by the capacity.
Individual Differences in Working Memory and Reading. A reading-span task variant implemented using flash. What’s in a danrman span?.